FMCC vs. FNMA
FMCC (Freddie Mac) and FNMA (Federal National Mortgage Association) are both stocks. Both operate in the Mortgage Finance industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FMCC returned 12.09%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for FNMA. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction.
Performance
FMCC vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FMCC having a -45.68% return and FNMA slightly lower at -46.04%. Over the past 10 years, FMCC has outperformed FNMA with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FNMA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.
FMCC
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -23.74%
- YTD
- -45.68%
- 1Y
- -23.92%
- 3Y*
- 127.13%
- 5Y*
- 37.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.26%
FNMA
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -29.30%
- YTD
- -46.04%
- 1Y
- -34.48%
- 3Y*
- 130.95%
- 5Y*
- 35.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FMCC Freddie Mac | $7.86M | $8.85M | $13.54M |
| $23.10M | $22.70M | $28.43M |
FMCC vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCC Freddie Mac | -45.68% | 210.52% | 284.18% | 140.59% | -57.43% | -64.38% | -22.33% | 183.02% | -57.94% | -32.62% |
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | -46.04% | 227.13% | 206.54% | 202.77% | -56.90% | -65.69% | -23.40% | 194.34% | -60.00% | -32.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMCC and FNMA is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1989 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FMCC and FNMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FMCC:
$3.58B
FNMA:
$6.74B
FMCC:
$5.34
FNMA:
$2.90
FMCC:
1.03
FNMA:
2.00
FMCC:
0.00
FNMA:
0.08
FMCC:
0.13
FNMA:
0.21
FMCC:
$100.82B
FNMA:
$161.49B
FMCC:
$100.82B
FNMA:
$117.87B
FMCC:
$95.90B
FNMA:
$112.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMCC vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank
FMCC
FNMA
FMCC vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMCC | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.01 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.40 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -0.65 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMCC vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and FNMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMCC | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -99.74% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.31% | -69.76% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.31% | -69.76% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.31% | -72.28% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.97% | -92.13% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.47% | -92.09% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.97% | -46.30% | -22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.74% | 42.96% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FMCC vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison
Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 16.29% compared to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) at 13.74%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMCC | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.29% | 13.74% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.92% | 65.68% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.40% | 93.13% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.19% | 90.78% | -5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.04% | 82.10% | -3.06% |
Dividends
FMCC vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither FMCC nor FNMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FMCC vs. FNMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freddie Mac and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FMCC and FNMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FMCC has higher volatility (16.29%) compared to FNMA (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCC dropped -99.81% vs FNMA's -99.74%.
FMCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMCC and FNMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer