PortfoliosLab logo
FMCC vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FMCC and AAPL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FMCC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMCC:

2.73

AAPL:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

FMCC:

3.51

AAPL:

0.91

Omega Ratio

FMCC:

1.43

AAPL:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FMCC:

3.08

AAPL:

0.48

Martin Ratio

FMCC:

15.11

AAPL:

1.63

Ulcer Index

FMCC:

20.09%

AAPL:

9.87%

Daily Std Dev

FMCC:

109.72%

AAPL:

32.99%

Max Drawdown

FMCC:

-99.71%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

FMCC:

-91.84%

AAPL:

-18.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FMCC:

$3.54B

AAPL:

$3.15T

EPS

FMCC:

-$0.02

AAPL:

$6.42

PEG Ratio

FMCC:

0.00

AAPL:

2.01

PS Ratio

FMCC:

0.15

AAPL:

7.86

PB Ratio

FMCC:

0.00

AAPL:

44.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

FMCC:

$24.01B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCC achieves a 66.90% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 7.92%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.


FMCC

YTD

66.90%

1M

13.07%

6M

146.61%

1Y

294.93%

5Y*

29.42%

10Y*

7.92%

AAPL

YTD

-15.62%

1M

6.52%

6M

-5.77%

1Y

15.69%

5Y*

23.14%

10Y*

22.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMCC vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMCC is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMCC is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMCC is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMCC is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMCC is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMCC is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMCC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FMCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCC and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FMCC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FMCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FMCC
Freddie Mac
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

FMCC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FMCC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 11.36%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FMCC vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freddie Mac and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
5.85B
95.36B
(FMCC) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items