FMAG vs. CCOR
FMAG (Fidelity Magellan ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAG returned 10.17%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMAG charges 0.57%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
FMAG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMAG achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.70% return.
FMAG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- -2.84%
- 3Y*
- -0.98%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FMAG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAG Fidelity Magellan ETF | 7.34% | 10.40% | 28.52% | 31.25% | -26.92% | 26.06% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -0.70% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMAG and CCOR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FMAG and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FMAG vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMAG
CCOR
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
FMAG
CCOR
Industrials
FMAG
CCOR
Consumer Cyclical
FMAG
CCOR
Financial Services
FMAG
CCOR
Communication Services
FMAG
CCOR
Healthcare
FMAG
CCOR
Basic Materials
FMAG
CCOR
Utilities
FMAG
CCOR
Consumer Defensive
FMAG
CCOR
Real Estate
FMAG
CCOR
Energy
FMAG
-
CCOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMAG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
FMAG
CCOR
FMAG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMAG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.94 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.37 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | -0.78 | +2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMAG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMAG drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAG and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMAG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -22.99% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | -8.79% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -12.31% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -22.99% | -9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -17.53% | +16.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -7.41% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 4.17% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FMAG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.96%. This indicates that FMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMAG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 3.96% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 6.19% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 7.96% | +7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 11.18% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 10.78% | +8.97% |
FMAG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMAG has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMAG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
FMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than CCOR's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
FMAG Fidelity Magellan ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.34% | 0.23% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMAG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMAG has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to CCOR (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAG dropped -32.93% vs CCOR's -22.99%.
On 5-year performance, FMAG leads with 10.17% vs -1.74% for CCOR. On fees, FMAG is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FMAG has performed better with a 10.17% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMAG is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.08% for FMAG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FMAG and 1.09% for CCOR.
FMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMAG and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer