FMAG vs. QQQ
FMAG (Fidelity Magellan ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. FMAG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAG returned 12.31%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
FMAG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMAG achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
FMAG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
FMAG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAG Fidelity Magellan ETF | 8.79% | 10.40% | 28.52% | 31.25% | -26.92% | 25.37% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 21.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMAG and QQQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FMAG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMAG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMAG
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
FMAG
QQQ
Industrials
FMAG
QQQ
Financial Services
FMAG
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
FMAG
QQQ
Communication Services
FMAG
QQQ
Healthcare
FMAG
QQQ
Basic Materials
FMAG
QQQ
Utilities
FMAG
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
FMAG
QQQ
Real Estate
FMAG
QQQ
Energy
FMAG
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMAG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FMAG
QQQ
FMAG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMAG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 2.73 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 3.55 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.47 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 3.71 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 14.30 | -10.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMAG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.73 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.83 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.41 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
FMAG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMAG drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMAG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -82.97% | +50.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | -11.96% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -22.77% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -35.12% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -32.79% | +23.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.11% | +0.84% |
Volatility
FMAG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is 3.58%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMAG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 4.48% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 12.11% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.22% | 15.95% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 22.39% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 22.30% | -2.61% |
FMAG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMAG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAG Fidelity Magellan ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.34% | 0.23% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMAG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FMAG (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAG dropped -32.93% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 12.31% for FMAG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMAG.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.08% for FMAG.
FMAG is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMAG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMAG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer