FLYU vs. OILU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO. Over the past 3 years, FLYU returned 4.85%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for OILU. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

FLYU vs. OILU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -18.15% return, which is significantly lower than OILU's 80.85% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 19.09%
• YTD: -18.15%
• 6M: -16.93%
• 1Y: 1.53%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILU

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: 80.85%
• 6M: 71.72%
• 1Y: 79.06%
• 3Y*: 6.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. OILU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-18.15%	-2.29%	33.00%	111.16%	-19.09%
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	80.85%	-16.50%	-21.65%	-32.50%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and OILU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.24

The correlation between FLYU and OILU shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLYU vs. OILU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLYU	OILU
Consumer Cyclical	52.6%	-
Industrials	17.7%	-
Technology	16.4%	-
Communication Services	13.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. OILU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

OILU

OILU Risk / Return Rank: 42
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 36
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. OILU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYU	OILU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	1.27	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	1.78	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.22	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	2.37	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	5.62	-5.56

FLYU vs. OILU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the OILU Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYU and OILU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. OILU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum OILU drawdown of -81.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and OILU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	OILU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-81.00%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	-33.51%	-18.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.00%	-69.09%	+0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.07%	-51.36%	+16.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-50.54%	+24.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.05%	14.12%	+10.93%

Volatility

FLYU vs. OILU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 23.60% compared to MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) at 21.88%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	OILU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.60%	21.88%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.07%	50.72%	+8.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.07%	62.50%	+12.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.21%	81.07%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.21%	81.07%	+2.14%

FLYU vs. OILU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLYU and OILU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

FLYU vs. OILU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYU nor OILU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYU and OILU in my portfolio?

FLYU and OILU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYU or OILU?

FLYU has higher volatility (23.60%) compared to OILU (21.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs OILU's -81.00%.

Which ETF is better, FLYU or OILU?

On 3-year performance, OILU leads with 6.45% vs 4.85% for FLYU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILU has been the lower-risk option at 21.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYU or OILU?

Over the 3-year period, OILU has performed better with a 6.45% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYU or OILU?

FLYU and OILU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYU or OILU?

FLYU and OILU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYU and OILU?

FLYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OILU is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: REX and BMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.