FLYU vs. BMNU
FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. FLYU is passively managed, while BMNU is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.
Performance
FLYU vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -85.87% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 22.36%
- YTD
- -6.83%
- 6M
- -11.90%
- 1Y
- 11.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU
- 1D
- -9.81%
- 1M
- -54.97%
- YTD
- -85.87%
- 6M
- -87.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYU vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -6.83% | -0.34% |
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -85.87% | -80.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and BMNU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLYU vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLYU | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and BMNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -98.28% | +29.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.09% | -98.28% | +72.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -80.69% | +54.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.32% | — | — |
Volatility
FLYU vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.84% | 185.14% | -110.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.28% | 185.14% | -101.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.28% | 185.14% | -101.86% |
FLYU vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYU vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLYU nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYU and BMNU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
FLYU and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 1.50% for BMNU.
Find the right allocation for FLYU and BMNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer