FLYU vs. BMNU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. FLYU is passively managed, while BMNU is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.

Performance

FLYU vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -73.22% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: 12.82%
• YTD: -20.70%
• 6M: -12.97%
• 1Y: -0.23%
• 3Y*: 10.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNU

• 1D: 10.82%
• 1M: -43.61%
• YTD: -73.22%
• 6M: -86.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-20.70%	-2.25%
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	-73.22%	-81.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and BMNU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLYU	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLYU	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	-0.53	+0.72

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and BMNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	BMNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-97.05%	+28.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.10%	-96.73%	+59.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.48%	-79.79%	+53.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	BMNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.74%	187.61%	-113.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.12%	187.61%	-104.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.12%	187.61%	-104.49%

FLYU vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLYU vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYU nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYU and BMNU in my portfolio?

FLYU and BMNU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLYU or BMNU?

On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYU or BMNU?

FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYU or BMNU?

FLYU and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYU and BMNU?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 1.50% for BMNU.