FLYU vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
FLYU and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLYU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both FLYU and TQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -36.34% | -2.29% | 33.00% | 111.16% | -17.79% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | -17.87% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -28.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -36.34% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's -17.87% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- YTD
- -36.34%
- 6M
- -33.82%
- 1Y
- -1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -17.87%
- 6M
- -17.28%
- 1Y
- 48.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 35.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLYU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
TQQQ
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 0.72 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.41 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.41 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 4.28 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 0.72 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.65 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and TQQQ is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.73% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and TQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -81.66% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | -36.97% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.50% | -28.08% | -21.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.81% | -18.66% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.34% | 12.13% | +9.21% |
Volatility
FLYU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 26.58% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 19.74%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.58% | 19.74% | +6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.62% | 38.50% | +16.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.66% | 67.35% | +25.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.98% | 66.53% | +16.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.98% | 65.83% | +17.15% |