FLYU vs. MSII
FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. FLYU is passively managed, while MSII is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSII.
Performance
FLYU vs. MSII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -22.33% return, which is significantly lower than MSII's -21.10% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- -3.42%
- 1M
- 13.89%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -16.52%
- 1Y
- -2.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSII
- 1D
- -8.30%
- 1M
- -32.66%
- YTD
- -21.10%
- 6M
- -34.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYU vs. MSII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -22.33% | 25.83% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -21.10% | -60.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and MSII is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. MSII — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
MSII
FLYU vs. MSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.97 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. MSII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum MSII drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and MSII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -78.73% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -74.38% | +35.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.47% | -46.16% | +19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FLYU vs. MSII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.74% | 71.20% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.16% | 71.20% | +11.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.16% | 71.20% | +11.96% |
FLYU vs. MSII - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYU vs. MSII - Dividend Comparison
FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 90.41% | 48.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYU and MSII have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 90.41%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.99% for MSII.
Find the right allocation for FLYU and MSII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer