PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXS vs. FUNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLXS vs. FUNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) and First United Corporation (FUNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXS achieves a 64.91% return, which is significantly higher than FUNC's 14.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FLXS has underperformed FUNC with an annualized return of 7.74%, while FUNC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.58% annualized return.


FLXS

1D
-0.02%
1M
15.35%
YTD
64.91%
6M
61.47%
1Y
84.86%
3Y*
54.13%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
7.74%

FUNC

1D
-0.78%
1M
13.73%
YTD
14.39%
6M
7.63%
1Y
53.10%
3Y*
44.64%
5Y*
22.55%
10Y*
18.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXS vs. FUNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
64.91%-25.95%192.93%26.12%-40.70%-21.76%80.92%-5.52%-51.45%-22.83%
FUNC
First United Corporation
14.39%14.29%48.25%25.24%8.04%25.12%-33.27%54.43%-7.20%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXS and FUNC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 1992

0.07

Over the past year, FLXS and FUNC have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

FLXS:

$5.52

FUNC:

$5.20

PE Ratio

FLXS:

11.74

FUNC:

8.13

PEG Ratio

FLXS:

0.06

FUNC:

0.68

PS Ratio

FLXS:

0.80

FUNC:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLXS:

$458.42M

FUNC:

$90.53M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLXS:

$106.25M

FUNC:

$63.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLXS:

$42.45M

FUNC:

$31.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXS vs. FUNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXS
FLXS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FUNC
FUNC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FUNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXS vs. FUNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) and First United Corporation (FUNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXSFUNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.84

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

8.19

-3.01

FLXS vs. FUNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FUNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXS and FUNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXS vs. FUNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXS drawdown since its inception was -85.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FUNC drawdown of -85.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXS and FUNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXSFUNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.58%

-85.84%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.65%

-13.90%

-19.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.10%

-37.76%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.15%

-44.90%

-23.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.58%

-54.91%

-30.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.78%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-30.94%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.44%

6.50%

+9.94%

Volatility

FLXS vs. FUNC - Volatility Comparison

Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to First United Corporation (FUNC) at 7.94%. This indicates that FLXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXSFUNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

7.94%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.80%

18.27%

+21.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.33%

29.21%

+24.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.44%

29.69%

+25.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.80%

32.76%

+19.04%

Dividends

FLXS vs. FUNC - Dividend Comparison

FLXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than FUNC's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
1.23%1.95%1.18%3.18%3.90%2.23%1.20%4.42%3.99%1.80%1.23%1.63%
FUNC
First United Corporation
2.37%2.46%2.43%3.32%3.05%3.09%3.35%1.66%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLXS vs. FUNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and First United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
115.13M
0
(FLXS) Total Revenue
(FUNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXS and FUNC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXS has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FUNC (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXS dropped -85.58% vs FUNC's -85.84%.

FUNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXS and FUNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer