FLXS vs. FUNC
FLXS (Flexsteel Industries, Inc.) and FUNC (First United Corporation) are both stocks. FLXS operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while FUNC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, FLXS returned 8.67%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for FUNC. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLXS vs. FUNC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXS achieves a 89.00% return, which is significantly higher than FUNC's 20.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FLXS has underperformed FUNC with an annualized return of 8.67%, while FUNC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.95% annualized return.
FLXS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 86.45%
- YTD
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 125.22%
- 3Y*
- 57.72%
- 5Y*
- 19.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
FUNC
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- 41.38%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.04M | $3.56M | $3.36M | |
| $1.53M | $1.27M | $1.04M |
FLXS vs. FUNC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 89.00% | -25.95% | 192.93% | 26.12% | -40.70% | -21.76% | 80.92% | -5.52% | -51.45% | -22.83% |
FUNC First United Corporation | 20.19% | 14.29% | 48.25% | 25.24% | 8.04% | 25.12% | -33.27% | 54.43% | -7.20% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXS and FUNC is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 1992 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, FLXS and FUNC have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FLXS:
$396.47M
FUNC:
$284.87M
FLXS:
$5.54
FUNC:
$3.90
FLXS:
13.36
FUNC:
11.31
FLXS:
0.06
FUNC:
0.95
FLXS:
0.91
FUNC:
2.36
FLXS:
$458.42M
FUNC:
$121.46M
FLXS:
$106.25M
FUNC:
$86.21M
FLXS:
$42.45M
FUNC:
$36.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXS vs. FUNC — Risk / Return Rank
FLXS
FUNC
FLXS vs. FUNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) and First United Corporation (FUNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXS | FUNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.74 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 6.03 | +1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXS vs. FUNC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXS drawdown since its inception was -85.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FUNC drawdown of -85.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXS and FUNC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXS | FUNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.58% | -85.84% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.65% | -13.90% | -19.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.10% | -37.76% | -16.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.67% | -44.90% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.58% | -54.91% | -30.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -3.87% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -30.85% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.15% | 6.31% | +9.84% |
Volatility
FLXS vs. FUNC - Volatility Comparison
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to First United Corporation (FUNC) at 6.58%. This indicates that FLXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXS | FUNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 6.58% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.09% | 17.12% | +21.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 28.25% | +24.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.28% | 29.72% | +25.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 32.82% | +19.02% |
Dividends
FLXS vs. FUNC - Dividend Comparison
FLXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than FUNC's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.95% | 1.18% | 3.18% | 3.90% | 2.23% | 1.20% | 4.42% | 3.99% | 1.80% | 1.23% | 1.63% |
FUNC First United Corporation | 2.36% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 3.32% | 3.05% | 3.09% | 3.35% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLXS vs. FUNC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and First United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLXS vs. FUNC - Profitability Comparison
FLXS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.05M and revenue of 115.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.
FUNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported a gross profit of 22.41M and revenue of 30.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.5%.
FLXS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.22M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
FUNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported an operating income of 8.84M and revenue of 30.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.
FLXS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 6.45M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
FUNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported a net income of 6.66M and revenue of 30.93M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXS and FUNC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLXS has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to FUNC (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXS dropped -85.58% vs FUNC's -85.84%.
FLXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLXS and FUNC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer