FLXS vs. DUK
FLXS (Flexsteel Industries, Inc.) and DUK (Duke Energy Corporation) are both stocks. FLXS operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while DUK operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, FLXS returned 8.67%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for DUK. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLXS vs. DUK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXS achieves a 89.00% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FLXS has outperformed DUK with an annualized return of 8.67%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.
FLXS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 86.45%
- YTD
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 125.22%
- 3Y*
- 57.72%
- 5Y*
- 19.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
DUK
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $477.93M | $469.09M | $452.15M | |
| $4.04M | $3.56M | $3.36M |
FLXS vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 89.00% | -25.95% | 192.93% | 26.12% | -40.70% | -21.76% | 80.92% | -5.52% | -51.45% | -22.83% |
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 8.86% | 12.72% | 15.56% | -1.63% | 2.03% | 19.11% | 4.77% | 10.29% | 7.41% | 12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXS and DUK is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.03 |
The correlation between FLXS and DUK shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLXS:
$396.47M
DUK:
$97.78B
FLXS:
$5.54
DUK:
$6.61
FLXS:
13.36
DUK:
18.99
FLXS:
0.06
DUK:
1.49
FLXS:
0.91
DUK:
2.93
FLXS:
1.44
DUK:
1.83
FLXS:
$458.42M
DUK:
$33.29B
FLXS:
$106.25M
DUK:
$19.45B
FLXS:
$42.45M
DUK:
$15.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXS vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank
FLXS
DUK
FLXS vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXS | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.08 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 0.62 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 1.39 | +6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXS vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXS drawdown since its inception was -85.58%, which is greater than DUK's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXS and DUK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXS | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.58% | -71.92% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.65% | -10.88% | -22.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.10% | -11.59% | -42.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.67% | -24.16% | -38.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.58% | -37.37% | -48.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -5.20% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -10.83% | -18.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.15% | 4.84% | +11.31% |
Volatility
FLXS vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 6.63%. This indicates that FLXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXS | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 6.63% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.09% | 12.49% | +26.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 15.65% | +36.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.28% | 17.96% | +37.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 20.46% | +31.38% |
Dividends
FLXS vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison
FLXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than DUK's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 3.40% | 3.60% | 3.84% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 4.17% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 4.15% | 4.33% | 4.54% |
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.95% | 1.18% | 3.18% | 3.90% | 2.23% | 1.20% | 4.42% | 3.99% | 1.80% | 1.23% | 1.63% |
Financials
FLXS vs. DUK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLXS vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison
FLXS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.05M and revenue of 115.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.
DUK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.
FLXS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.22M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
DUK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
FLXS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 6.45M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
DUK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXS and DUK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLXS has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to DUK (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXS dropped -85.58% vs DUK's -71.92%.
FLXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLXS and DUK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer