FLXS vs. AMRX
FLXS (Flexsteel Industries, Inc.) and AMRX (Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. FLXS operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while AMRX operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FLXS returned 8.67%/yr vs -5.11%/yr for AMRX. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLXS vs. AMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXS achieves a 89.00% return, which is significantly higher than AMRX's 45.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FLXS has outperformed AMRX with an annualized return of 8.67%, while AMRX has yielded a comparatively lower -5.11% annualized return.
FLXS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 86.45%
- YTD
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 125.22%
- 3Y*
- 57.72%
- 5Y*
- 19.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
AMRX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 33.92%
- YTD
- 45.40%
- 1Y
- 133.97%
- 3Y*
- 79.45%
- 5Y*
- 30.02%
- 10Y*
- -5.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.37M | $32.67M | $30.54M | |
| $4.04M | $3.56M | $3.36M |
FLXS vs. AMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 89.00% | -25.95% | 192.93% | 26.12% | -40.70% | -21.76% | 80.92% | -5.52% | -51.45% | -22.83% |
AMRX Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 45.40% | 59.09% | 30.48% | 205.03% | -58.46% | 4.81% | -5.19% | -64.38% | -18.74% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXS and AMRX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2009 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
FLXS:
$396.47M
AMRX:
$5.85B
FLXS:
$5.54
AMRX:
$0.48
FLXS:
13.36
AMRX:
37.97
FLXS:
0.06
AMRX:
1.32
FLXS:
0.91
AMRX:
1.92
FLXS:
1.44
AMRX:
182.01
FLXS:
$458.42M
AMRX:
$3.12B
FLXS:
$106.25M
AMRX:
$1.23B
FLXS:
$42.45M
AMRX:
$447.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXS vs. AMRX — Risk / Return Rank
FLXS
AMRX
FLXS vs. AMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXS | AMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.58 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 6.07 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 15.13 | -7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXS vs. AMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXS drawdown since its inception was -85.58%, smaller than the maximum AMRX drawdown of -97.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXS and AMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXS | AMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.58% | -97.52% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.65% | -22.25% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.10% | -26.80% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.67% | -78.29% | +15.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.58% | -95.93% | +10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -64.30% | +59.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -54.42% | +25.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.15% | 8.91% | +7.24% |
Volatility
FLXS vs. AMRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) is 9.24%, while Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FLXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXS | AMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 9.86% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.09% | 25.71% | +13.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 33.29% | +19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.28% | 50.81% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 65.25% | -13.41% |
Dividends
FLXS vs. AMRX - Dividend Comparison
FLXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while AMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMRX Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLXS Flexsteel Industries, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.95% | 1.18% | 3.18% | 3.90% | 2.23% | 1.20% | 4.42% | 3.99% | 1.80% | 1.23% | 1.63% |
Financials
FLXS vs. AMRX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLXS vs. AMRX - Profitability Comparison
FLXS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.05M and revenue of 115.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.
AMRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 334.51M and revenue of 796.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.
FLXS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.22M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
AMRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.30M and revenue of 796.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
FLXS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 6.45M and revenue of 115.13M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
AMRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 57.66M and revenue of 796.20M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXS and AMRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMRX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FLXS (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXS dropped -85.58% vs AMRX's -97.52%.
AMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLXS and AMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer