FLXN vs. PHYD
FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
FLXN vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLXN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXN vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 3.25% | 4.71% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.32% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXN and PHYD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FLXN and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXN vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
FLXN
PHYD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLXN vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXN | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXN vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXN | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | — | — |
Volatility
FLXN vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXN | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.99% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.99% | — | — |
FLXN vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXN vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, while PHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 8.40% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 8.52% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXN and PHYD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PHYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PHYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 8.40% for FLXN.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.55% for PHYD.
Find the right allocation for FLXN and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer