PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXN vs. BNDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXN vs. BNDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than BNDY's 1.19% return.


FLXN

1D
0.20%
1M
0.60%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDY

1D
0.32%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXN vs. BNDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
2.50%4.71%
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
1.19%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and BNDY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXN vs. BNDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLXN vs. BNDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXNBNDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

1.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. BNDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum BNDY drawdown of -3.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and BNDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXNBNDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-3.93%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.84%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.63%

+0.25%

Volatility

FLXN vs. BNDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXNBNDYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

5.01%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

5.01%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

5.01%

+0.03%

FLXN vs. BNDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDY's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXN vs. BNDY - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than BNDY's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
4.82%1.89%
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
7.49%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXN and BNDY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 4.82% for BNDY.

FLXN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BNDY is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.66% for BNDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXN and BNDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer