FLTR vs. VUSB
FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and VUSB (Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while VUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard. FLTR is passively managed, while VUSB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLTR returned 4.50%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for VUSB. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VUSB.
Performance
FLTR vs. VUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than VUSB's 1.48% return.
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
VUSB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR vs. VUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 2.03% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.12% |
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.48% | 5.20% | 5.68% | 5.52% | -0.36% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and VUSB is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. VUSB — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
VUSB
FLTR vs. VUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTR | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.13 | 3.34 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.83 | 12.12 | +4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.54 | 69.82 | +30.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. VUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than VUSB's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and VUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -1.79% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -0.37% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -0.46% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | -1.79% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -0.27% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. VUSB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB) at 0.19%. This indicates that FLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 0.19% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.63% | 0.53% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78% | 0.65% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 0.83% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 0.82% | +4.18% |
FLTR vs. VUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSB's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTR vs. VUSB - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than VUSB's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 4.39% | 4.63% | 5.16% | 4.45% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and VUSB have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to VUSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs VUSB's -1.79%.
On 5-year performance, FLTR leads with 4.50% vs 3.45% for VUSB. On fees, VUSB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUSB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.39% for VUSB.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUSB is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.10% for VUSB.
VUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 6.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and VUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer