PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLTB vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLTB vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
0.14%6.60%5.14%5.94%-5.88%-1.20%5.57%5.87%1.06%2.10%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
-4.86%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 2.47%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.78% annualized return.


FLTB

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
2.47%

MGC

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTB vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLTB vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
FLTB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FLTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTB vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTBMGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.01

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

1.56

+1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.64

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.68

7.19

+5.50

FLTB vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and MGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTBMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.01

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.82

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.56

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and MGC is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLTB vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than MGC's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.37%4.31%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.01%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and MGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTBMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-51.93%

+42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-11.93%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

-25.74%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.37%

-33.07%

+23.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-6.33%

+5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-7.12%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.72%

-2.35%

Volatility

FLTB vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.97%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLTBMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

5.54%

-4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

9.86%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

18.80%

-16.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.78%

17.26%

-14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.93%

18.19%

-15.26%