PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLTB vs. MINT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FLTBMINT
YTD Return4.60%5.18%
1Y Return8.07%6.01%
3Y Return (Ann)1.41%3.41%
5Y Return (Ann)1.76%2.44%
10Y Return (Ann)2.06%2.12%
Sharpe Ratio3.2113.53
Sortino Ratio5.3032.42
Omega Ratio1.679.46
Calmar Ratio1.7146.74
Martin Ratio19.86506.77
Ulcer Index0.41%0.01%
Daily Std Dev2.51%0.45%
Max Drawdown-9.37%-4.62%
Current Drawdown-1.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FLTB and MINT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FLTB vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 5.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTB having a 2.06% annualized return and MINT not far ahead at 2.12%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.42%
2.75%
FLTB
MINT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTB vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLTB and MINT have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLTB: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for MINT: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTB vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLTB, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLTB, currently valued at 5.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLTB, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.67
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLTB, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLTB, currently valued at 19.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.86
MINT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MINT, currently valued at 13.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.0013.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MINT, currently valued at 32.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0032.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MINT, currently valued at 9.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.009.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MINT, currently valued at 46.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0046.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MINT, currently valued at 506.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00506.77

FLTB vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 13.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and MINT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.0020.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.21
13.53
FLTB
MINT

Dividends

FLTB vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than MINT's 5.32% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
3.96%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%0.35%0.00%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.32%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%0.88%

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.00%
0
FLTB
MINT

Volatility

FLTB vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.10%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.49%
0.10%
FLTB
MINT