PortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. MINT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and MINT is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLTB vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLTB:

2.84

MINT:

10.38

Sortino Ratio

FLTB:

4.63

MINT:

20.62

Omega Ratio

FLTB:

1.58

MINT:

6.07

Calmar Ratio

FLTB:

5.04

MINT:

32.71

Martin Ratio

FLTB:

15.80

MINT:

234.75

Ulcer Index

FLTB:

0.44%

MINT:

0.02%

Daily Std Dev

FLTB:

2.34%

MINT:

0.50%

Max Drawdown

FLTB:

-9.37%

MINT:

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

FLTB:

-0.23%

MINT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 1.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTB having a 2.21% annualized return and MINT not far ahead at 2.32%.


FLTB

YTD

2.47%

1M

0.77%

6M

2.96%

1Y

6.61%

5Y*

1.90%

10Y*

2.21%

MINT

YTD

1.65%

1M

0.48%

6M

2.33%

1Y

5.13%

5Y*

2.88%

10Y*

2.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTB vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLTB and MINT have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTB vs. MINT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTB is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINT is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLTB vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 10.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and MINT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLTB vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than MINT's 5.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.23%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%0.35%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.10%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLTB vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.14%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...