PortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. FLRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and FLRT is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLTB vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLTB:

3.03

FLRT:

2.34

Sortino Ratio

FLTB:

4.79

FLRT:

2.96

Omega Ratio

FLTB:

1.60

FLRT:

1.84

Calmar Ratio

FLTB:

5.30

FLRT:

2.34

Martin Ratio

FLTB:

16.61

FLRT:

12.63

Ulcer Index

FLTB:

0.44%

FLRT:

0.53%

Daily Std Dev

FLTB:

2.38%

FLRT:

2.89%

Max Drawdown

FLTB:

-9.37%

FLRT:

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

FLTB:

0.00%

FLRT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 2.28%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.33% annualized return.


FLTB

YTD

2.75%

1M

0.31%

6M

2.55%

1Y

6.95%

3Y*

4.06%

5Y*

1.79%

10Y*

2.28%

FLRT

YTD

1.97%

1M

1.87%

6M

2.51%

1Y

6.70%

3Y*

9.28%

5Y*

6.43%

10Y*

4.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF

Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF

FLTB vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLTB vs. FLRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTB is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLRT is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLTB vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and FLRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLTB vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than FLRT's 7.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.25%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%0.35%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
7.42%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.97%3.20%3.38%3.21%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and FLRT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLTB vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.61%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...