PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSW vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


FLSW

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.15%
YTD
3.42%
6M
7.16%
1Y
14.26%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
3.42%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-7.85%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.59

The correlation between FLSW and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLSW vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSW
VOO

Healthcare

37.4%
8.5%

Financial Services

18.0%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
4.9%

Industrials

13.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

7.7%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Communication Services

1.2%
11.3%

Technology

1.1%
35.7%

Utilities

0.2%
2.4%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

FLSW
37.4%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

FLSW
18.0%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLSW
14.0%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

FLSW
13.8%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

FLSW
7.7%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSW
5.2%
VOO
10.2%

Real Estate

FLSW
1.3%
VOO
1.9%

Communication Services

FLSW
1.2%
VOO
11.3%

Technology

FLSW
1.1%
VOO
35.7%

Utilities

FLSW
0.2%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

FLSW

-

VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSW vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSWVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

2.53

-1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

3.43

-2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.42

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.63

15.95

-12.32

FLSW vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSWVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.53

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.85

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.89

-0.32

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSWVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-33.99%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-8.90%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-18.69%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

-24.52%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

0.00%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-3.69%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

1.91%

+2.18%

Volatility

FLSW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that FLSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSWVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

2.74%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

8.88%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

11.78%

+3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.81%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.01%

-1.13%

FLSW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.05%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSW and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSW has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 7.38% for FLSW. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLSW.

FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSW and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer