FLSW vs. FLCA
FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSW returned 6.39%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for FLCA. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLSW vs. FLCA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLCA's 7.39% return.
FLSW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSW vs. FLCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 1.74% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 7.39% | 34.62% | 13.02% | 14.71% | -11.93% | 28.67% | 6.31% | 28.42% | -11.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSW and FLCA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FLSW and FLCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLSW vs. FLCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLSW
FLCA
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
FLSW
FLCA
-
Financial Services
FLSW
FLCA
Consumer Defensive
FLSW
FLCA
Industrials
FLSW
FLCA
Basic Materials
FLSW
FLCA
Consumer Cyclical
FLSW
FLCA
Real Estate
FLSW
FLCA
Communication Services
FLSW
FLCA
Technology
FLSW
FLCA
Utilities
FLSW
FLCA
Energy
FLSW
-
FLCA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSW vs. FLCA — Risk / Return Rank
FLSW
FLCA
FLSW vs. FLCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSW | FLCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 3.34 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 13.55 | -10.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSW | FLCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.01 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.69 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FLSW vs. FLCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum FLCA drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and FLCA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSW | FLCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -41.51% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -8.55% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -12.58% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -24.23% | -3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -2.52% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -5.90% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 2.10% | +2.06% |
Volatility
FLSW vs. FLCA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is 4.10%, while Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FLSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSW | FLCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.42% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 11.46% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 14.25% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 16.76% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 19.06% | -2.17% |
FLSW vs. FLCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLSW and FLCA have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLSW vs. FLCA - Dividend Comparison
FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than FLCA's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 1.73% | 1.85% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 2.49% | 2.29% | 3.03% | 0.09% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSW and FLCA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCA has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FLSW (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs FLCA's -41.51%.
On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.54% vs 6.39% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSW and FLCA have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.73% for FLCA.
FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLCA is Canada Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index.
FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSW and FLCA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer