PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSW vs. FLCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSW vs. FLCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLCA's 7.39% return.


FLSW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
1.74%
6M
5.66%
1Y
11.98%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*

FLCA

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.39%
6M
10.52%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. FLCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
1.74%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-7.85%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
7.39%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and FLCA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018

0.59

The correlation between FLSW and FLCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLSW vs. FLCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSW
FLCA

Healthcare

37.4%

-

Financial Services

18.0%
38.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
2.9%

Industrials

13.8%
10.4%

Basic Materials

7.7%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

1.2%
0.5%

Technology

1.1%
8.3%

Utilities

0.2%
2.2%

Energy

-

17.4%

Healthcare

FLSW
37.4%
FLCA

-

Financial Services

FLSW
18.0%
FLCA
38.7%

Consumer Defensive

FLSW
14.0%
FLCA
2.9%

Industrials

FLSW
13.8%
FLCA
10.4%

Basic Materials

FLSW
7.7%
FLCA
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSW
5.2%
FLCA
3.3%

Real Estate

FLSW
1.3%
FLCA
0.2%

Communication Services

FLSW
1.2%
FLCA
0.5%

Technology

FLSW
1.1%
FLCA
8.3%

Utilities

FLSW
0.2%
FLCA
2.2%

Energy

FLSW

-

FLCA
17.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSW vs. FLCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. FLCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSWFLCADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.34

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

13.55

-10.67

FLSW vs. FLCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FLCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and FLCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSWFLCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.01

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.69

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. FLCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum FLCA drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and FLCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSWFLCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-41.51%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-8.55%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-12.58%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

-24.23%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-2.52%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-5.90%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.10%

+2.06%

Volatility

FLSW vs. FLCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is 4.10%, while Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FLSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSWFLCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

4.42%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

11.46%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

14.25%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.76%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

19.06%

-2.17%

FLSW vs. FLCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLSW and FLCA have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSW vs. FLCA - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than FLCA's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.73%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.08%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSW and FLCA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCA has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FLSW (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs FLCA's -41.51%.

On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.54% vs 6.39% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSW and FLCA have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLSW has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.73% for FLCA.

FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLCA is Canada Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSW and FLCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer