FLRT vs. QDPL
FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. FLRT is actively managed, while QDPL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRT returned 6.08%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for QDPL. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FLRT vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRT achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.98% return.
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
QDPL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.79M | $4.57M | $4.68M | |
| $5.42M | $5.30M | $6.18M |
FLRT vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.44% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 1.22% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.98% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRT and QDPL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.33 |
The correlation between FLRT and QDPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRT vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
FLRT
QDPL
FLRT vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLRT | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.31 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.55 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | 10.97 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLRT vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRT drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRT and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRT | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | -22.59% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.78% | -8.65% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.87% | -17.75% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | -22.59% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -5.04% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 2.00% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FLRT vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) is 0.29%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that FLRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRT | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.29% | 3.35% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 10.01% | -8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | 12.65% | -11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.30% | 15.04% | -12.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 15.00% | -8.91% |
FLRT vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLRT and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FLRT vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than QDPL's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.71% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.51% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRT and QDPL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDPL has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRT dropped -20.96% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 5-year performance, QDPL leads with 12.06% vs 6.08% for FLRT. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLRT and QDPL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 4.51% for QDPL.
FLRT is categorized as Bank Loan, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLRT and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer