PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRLX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRLX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than FKDNX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRLX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.


FLRLX

1D
2.02%
1M
-0.37%
6M
6.22%
YTD
9.29%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
9.33%

FKDNX

1D
4.48%
1M
-5.22%
6M
2.79%
YTD
1.52%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
16.45%
ALL TIME*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
9.29%20.46%14.99%18.90%-17.36%17.28%16.02%22.52%-7.14%19.04%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
1.52%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRLX and FKDNX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2015

0.83

The correlation between FLRLX and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRLX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLRLX
FLRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FLRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRLXFKDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.07

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.36

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

1.04

+7.97

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRLX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRLX drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRLX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRLXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-51.63%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-20.49%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-26.23%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-48.28%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

-48.28%

+11.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-10.55%

+8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-11.24%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

7.07%

-4.96%

Volatility

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) is 3.82%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that FLRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRLXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

8.76%

-4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

19.68%

-9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

23.82%

-11.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

26.75%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

24.87%

-8.49%

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRLX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRLX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FLRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than FKDNX's 11.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
11.00%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
6.14%6.74%3.17%2.49%4.28%21.72%4.14%3.20%6.45%2.33%2.44%4.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRLX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to FLRLX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRLX dropped -36.66% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

FLRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRLX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer