PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRLX vs. SHAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRLX achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than SHAPX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRLX has underperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


FLRLX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.85%
1Y
21.51%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.21%

SHAPX

1D
-1.08%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
3.19%
6M
2.25%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
8.71%20.46%14.99%18.90%-17.36%17.28%16.02%22.52%-7.14%19.04%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
3.19%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRLX and SHAPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FLRLX and SHAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRLX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRLX
FLRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRLXSHAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.54

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

6.82

+4.45

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the SHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRLX and SHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRLX drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, smaller than the maximum SHAPX drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRLX and SHAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRLXSHAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-46.19%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.74%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-16.15%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-20.53%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

-32.21%

-4.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-3.16%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-4.77%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.97%

+0.07%

Volatility

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund (FLRLX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FLRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRLXSHAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

3.93%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

8.60%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

10.99%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

14.93%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.74%

-0.36%

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRLX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRLX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison

FLRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than SHAPX's 13.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRLX
Franklin LifeSmart 2045 Retirement Target Fund
6.17%6.74%3.17%2.49%4.28%21.72%4.14%3.20%6.45%2.33%2.44%4.46%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.64%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLRLX and SHAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLRLX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SHAPX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRLX dropped -36.66% vs SHAPX's -46.19%.

FLRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRLX and SHAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer