PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. TMFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQS vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQS vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
-0.70%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-8.71%
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
-8.10%-1.59%15.41%25.40%-33.15%-2.38%58.52%40.19%-8.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than TMFS's -8.10% return.


FLQS

1D
1.70%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*

TMFS

1D
3.19%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
-1.30%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQS vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFS
TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSTMFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.05

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

0.10

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.01

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.09

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

-0.25

+3.26

FLQS vs. TMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the TMFS Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and TMFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSTMFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.05

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.13

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.31

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and TMFS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLQS vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.45%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%2.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum TMFS drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and TMFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSTMFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-48.79%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-15.73%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-45.68%

+17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-25.54%

+18.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-19.45%

+11.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

5.27%

-1.68%

Volatility

FLQS vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 5.22%, while Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQSTMFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

6.89%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

14.48%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

24.44%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

22.98%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

25.65%

-3.84%