FLQS vs. MDY
FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - FLQS tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQS returned 5.27%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for MDY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MDY.
Performance
FLQS vs. MDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than MDY's 13.91% return.
FLQS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
MDY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
FLQS vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 6.14% | 5.04% | 8.34% | 21.28% | -16.88% | 26.58% | 10.51% | 18.34% | -5.86% | 7.41% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 13.91% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQS and MDY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FLQS and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQS vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQS
MDY
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FLQS
MDY
Industrials
FLQS
MDY
Consumer Cyclical
FLQS
MDY
Financial Services
FLQS
MDY
Healthcare
FLQS
MDY
Consumer Defensive
FLQS
MDY
Real Estate
FLQS
MDY
Utilities
FLQS
MDY
Energy
FLQS
MDY
Basic Materials
FLQS
MDY
Communication Services
FLQS
MDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQS vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank
FLQS
MDY
FLQS vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLQS | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.85 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 10.38 | -5.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLQS | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.63 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FLQS vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum MDY drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and MDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQS | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -55.33% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -8.82% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -24.03% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -24.03% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.09% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.03% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.42% | +0.63% |
Volatility
FLQS vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 4.09%, while SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQS | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.33% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 11.28% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 15.48% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 19.77% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 21.19% | +0.49% |
FLQS vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQS vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison
FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than MDY's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.75% | 1.40% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQS and MDY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDY has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FLQS (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs MDY's -55.33%.
On 5-year performance, MDY leads with 7.92% vs 5.27% for FLQS. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MDY has performed better with a 7.92% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.
FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.04% for MDY.
FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.23% for MDY.
MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQS and MDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer