FLQM vs. PWC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FLQM tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index while PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQM returned 6.90%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for PWC. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.

Performance

FLQM vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than PWC's 5.98% return.

FLQM

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 8.05%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: —

PWC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: 8.92%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 6.28%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.19%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	-12.95%	28.76%	15.50%	28.56%	-4.24%	10.32%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	5.98%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and PWC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017	0.80

The correlation between FLQM and PWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQM vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLQM	PWC
Consumer Cyclical	18.7%	11.5%
Industrials	18.4%	10.3%
Financial Services	15.4%	14.0%
Technology	12.4%	26.1%
Healthcare	12.2%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	6.8%
Energy	5.4%	5.5%
Real Estate	4.4%	5.6%
Communication Services	3.3%	7.0%
Utilities	1.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.2%	3.5%

Return for Risk

FLQM vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 27
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLQM	PWC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.92	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.39	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.16	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	1.41	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.97	4.34	-1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLQM vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLQM	PWC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	0.92	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.39	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.11	+0.47

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and PWC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQM	PWC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-78.13%	+40.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.57%	-6.45%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.70%	-15.12%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.51%	-26.58%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-2.25%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-36.21%	+31.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	2.10%	+0.60%

Volatility

FLQM vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.31%. This indicates that FLQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQM	PWC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.31%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	7.24%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.18%	9.74%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	16.07%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.48%	18.82%	-0.34%

FLQM vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLQM vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.51%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQM and PWC in my portfolio?

FLQM and PWC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLQM or PWC?

FLQM has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to PWC (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs PWC's -78.13%.

Which ETF is better, FLQM or PWC?

On 5-year performance, FLQM leads with 6.90% vs 6.28% for PWC. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLQM or PWC?

Over the 5-year period, FLQM has performed better with a 6.90% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQM or PWC?

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQM or PWC?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.51% for FLQM.

What is the main difference between FLQM and PWC?

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.60% for PWC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.