PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQM vs. JPSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQM vs. JPSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than JPSE's 16.66% return.


FLQM

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.68%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

JPSE

1D
1.09%
1M
0.99%
YTD
16.66%
6M
17.30%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. JPSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.19%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-4.24%10.32%
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
16.66%8.77%8.07%15.87%-14.40%29.31%12.49%22.95%-8.61%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and JPSE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.80

The correlation between FLQM and JPSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLQM vs. JPSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQM
JPSE

Consumer Cyclical

18.7%
7.9%

Industrials

18.4%
11.7%

Financial Services

15.4%
9.7%

Technology

12.4%
14.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.1%

Energy

5.4%
8.9%

Real Estate

4.4%
13.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.7%

Utilities

1.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

0.2%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQM
18.7%
JPSE
7.9%

Industrials

FLQM
18.4%
JPSE
11.7%

Financial Services

FLQM
15.4%
JPSE
9.7%

Technology

FLQM
12.4%
JPSE
14.6%

Healthcare

FLQM
12.2%
JPSE
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLQM
7.7%
JPSE
8.1%

Energy

FLQM
5.4%
JPSE
8.9%

Real Estate

FLQM
4.4%
JPSE
13.1%

Communication Services

FLQM
3.3%
JPSE
2.7%

Utilities

FLQM
1.6%
JPSE
4.8%

Basic Materials

FLQM
0.2%
JPSE
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQM vs. JPSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JPSE
JPSE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JPSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. JPSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQMJPSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.19

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.13

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

4.36

-3.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

15.58

-12.61

FLQM vs. JPSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the JPSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and JPSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQMJPSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.19

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.37

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. JPSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum JPSE drawdown of -43.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and JPSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQMJPSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-43.02%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-8.00%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-25.49%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-25.56%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.34%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-7.43%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.24%

+0.46%

Volatility

FLQM vs. JPSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) is 2.91%, while JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that FLQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQMJPSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.52%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

10.86%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

15.96%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

20.07%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

21.82%

-3.34%

FLQM vs. JPSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JPSE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQM vs. JPSE - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than JPSE's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%0.00%
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.36%1.62%1.66%1.76%1.55%1.24%1.32%1.23%1.18%0.74%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQM and JPSE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPSE has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FLQM (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs JPSE's -43.02%.

On 5-year performance, JPSE leads with 7.41% vs 6.90% for FLQM. On fees, JPSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPSE has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLQM.

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.36% for JPSE.

FLQM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JPSE is Small Cap Growth Equities. FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while JPSE tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.29% for JPSE.

JPSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQM and JPSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer