FLQM vs. XMHQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and XMHQ (Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FLQM tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index while XMHQ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQM returned 6.86%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for XMHQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMHQ.

Performance

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 8.87% return.

FLQM

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: -0.59%
• 1Y: 7.81%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

XMHQ

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 16.53%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 13.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.19%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	-12.95%	28.76%	15.50%	28.56%	-4.24%	10.32%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	8.87%	4.71%	16.79%	29.51%	-12.42%	20.98%	26.61%	27.18%	-9.08%	9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and XMHQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017	0.84

The correlation between FLQM and XMHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLQM	XMHQ
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	9.4%
Industrials	17.9%	25.9%
Financial Services	15.1%	14.3%
Technology	13.4%	13.5%
Healthcare	12.3%	20.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	3.4%
Energy	5.3%	5.9%
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	2.7%
Utilities	1.6%	2.2%
Basic Materials	0.2%	5.0%

Return for Risk

FLQM vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 20
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XMHQ

XMHQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
XMHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XMHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
XMHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XMHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XMHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLQM	XMHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.06	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	1.63	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.18	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	1.88	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	5.48	-2.62

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XMHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and XMHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and XMHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQM	XMHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-58.19%	+20.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.57%	-8.85%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.70%	-24.56%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.51%	-25.47%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.26%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	-9.27%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	3.02%	-0.29%

Volatility

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) is 3.08%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that FLQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQM	XMHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	4.35%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	11.42%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.24%	15.76%	-3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.40%	20.74%	-4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	20.71%	-2.26%

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLQM vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than XMHQ's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.51%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	0.70%	0.64%	5.20%	0.73%	1.72%	1.00%	1.12%	1.22%	1.59%	1.06%	1.63%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQM and XMHQ in my portfolio?

FLQM and XMHQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLQM or XMHQ?

XMHQ has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to FLQM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs XMHQ's -58.19%.

Which ETF is better, FLQM or XMHQ?

On 5-year performance, XMHQ leads with 9.84% vs 6.86% for FLQM. On fees, XMHQ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLQM or XMHQ?

Over the 5-year period, XMHQ has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQM or XMHQ?

XMHQ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQM or XMHQ?

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.70% for XMHQ.

What is the main difference between FLQM and XMHQ?

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while XMHQ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.25% for XMHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.