FLM vs. RWEM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and RWEM (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while RWEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.27 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RWEM.

Performance

FLM vs. RWEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RWEM

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: 8.00%
• 6M: 19.77%
• YTD: 25.06%
• 1Y: 45.05%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$280.19K	$299.33K	$571.96K

FLM vs. RWEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	-4.55%
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLM and RWEM is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	-0.27

FLM vs. RWEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLM	RWEM
Industrials	32.5%	5.1%
Energy	8.1%	4.1%
Technology	7.9%	41.1%
Basic Materials	7.4%	4.7%
Real Estate	5.7%	0.3%
Communication Services	0.7%	7.9%
Utilities	0.7%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Financial Services	-	18.1%
Healthcare	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

FLM vs. RWEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RWEM

RWEM Risk / Return Rank: 54
RWEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RWEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RWEM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RWEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RWEM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLM vs. RWEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLM	RWEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.61	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FLM	RWEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-26.92%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.58%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLM	RWEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	37.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	23.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.03%	—

FLM vs. RWEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RWEM's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLM vs. RWEM - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RWEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.72%	2.15%	3.59%	1.60%	5.59%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLM and RWEM in my portfolio?

FLM and RWEM have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLM or RWEM?

On fees, RWEM is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLM or RWEM?

RWEM is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLM or RWEM?

RWEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

What is the main difference between FLM and RWEM?

FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while RWEM is Emerging Markets Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while RWEM tracks FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.52% for RWEM.