FLM vs. NLSI
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos. FLM is passively managed, while NLSI is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for NLSI.
Performance
FLM vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLM vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | -5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and NLSI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum NLSI drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and NLSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -13.82% | +9.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -7.33% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -6.03% | +3.76% |
Volatility
FLM vs. NLSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 19.91% | +31.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 19.91% | +31.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 19.91% | +31.11% |
FLM vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.58% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and NLSI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while NLSI is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 2.89% for NLSI.
Find the right allocation for FLM and NLSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer