PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLM vs. NLSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLM vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLM

1D
-4.55%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NLSI

1D
-1.65%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLM vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLM and NLSI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLM vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLM vs. NLSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLM vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum NLSI drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and NLSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMNLSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-13.82%

+9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-7.33%

+2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-6.03%

+3.76%

Volatility

FLM vs. NLSI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMNLSIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.02%

19.91%

+31.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.02%

19.91%

+31.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.02%

19.91%

+31.11%

FLM vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLM vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLM and NLSI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while NLSI is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 2.89% for NLSI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLM and NLSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer