FLM vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

FLM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLM

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	-4.55%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FLM and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	-0.13

Return for Risk

FLM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLM	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	16.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	58.67	—

Drawdowns

FLM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLM	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-0.90%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.55%	-0.08%	-4.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-0.10%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLM	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.02%	0.89%	+50.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.02%	1.56%	+49.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.02%	1.56%	+49.46%

FLM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.58%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLM and IBIC in my portfolio?

FLM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLM or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLM or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLM or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

What is the main difference between FLM and IBIC?

FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.10% for IBIC.