FLLA vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLLA is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLLA returned 7.11%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLLA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

FLLA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 11.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 97.22% return.

FLLA

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -3.75%
• YTD: 11.00%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: -12.51%
• 1M: 7.54%
• YTD: 97.22%
• 6M: 107.52%
• 1Y: 178.78%
• 3Y*: 48.47%
• 5Y*: 17.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	11.00%	51.81%	-26.89%	32.71%	7.78%	-8.93%	-15.08%	19.59%	-2.78%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	97.22%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLA and FLKR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018	0.49

FLLA vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLLA	FLKR
Financial Services	24.4%	7.5%
Basic Materials	20.1%	1.9%
Energy	11.7%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	11.4%	1.4%
Industrials	11.4%	14.6%
Utilities	9.0%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.9%	2.0%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	6.3%
Healthcare	1.6%	2.4%
Technology	0.4%	62.9%

Return for Risk

FLLA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLA

FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 45
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLLA	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	3.71	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.60	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.54	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	7.81	-5.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	26.91	-20.11

FLLA vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLA and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLLA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLLA	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.88%	-50.06%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-23.03%	+9.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.76%	-26.39%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.32%	-49.51%	+21.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.25%	-12.51%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-21.98%	+8.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	6.67%	-1.83%

Volatility

FLLA vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) is 5.89%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 30.00%. This indicates that FLLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLLA	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	30.00%	-24.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.85%	45.17%	-27.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.71%	48.46%	-26.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.87%	30.50%	-7.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.49%	28.88%	-1.39%

FLLA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLLA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than FLKR's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.86%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	3.49%	6.06%	7.04%	5.45%	9.55%	7.60%	2.12%	3.18%	0.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLLA and FLKR in my portfolio?

FLLA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLLA or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (30.00%) compared to FLLA (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLA dropped -53.88% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, FLLA or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.46% vs 7.11% for FLLA. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLLA has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLLA or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLLA or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLLA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLLA or FLKR?

FLLA has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.86% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FLLA and FLKR?

FLLA is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLLA and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.