FLLA vs. ILF
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF).
FLLA and ILF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. Both FLLA and ILF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLLA vs. ILF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLLA vs. ILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 17.39% | 51.81% | -26.89% | 32.71% | 7.78% | -8.93% | -15.08% | 19.59% | -2.78% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 16.65% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -4.69% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLLA having a 17.39% return and ILF slightly lower at 16.65%.
FLLA
- 1D
- 3.89%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 54.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ILF
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLLA vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ILF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLLA vs. ILF — Risk / Return Rank
FLLA
ILF
FLLA vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLLA | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.48 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | 3.06 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 4.47 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 15.54 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLLA | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.48 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and ILF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLLA vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than ILF's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 5.16% | 6.06% | 7.04% | 5.45% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.18% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.76% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and ILF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLLA | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.88% | -67.48% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -12.67% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -29.71% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -4.82% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -24.07% | +10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FLLA vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) have volatilities of 11.50% and 11.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLLA | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 11.60% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 17.90% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 23.59% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 23.24% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 28.59% | -0.93% |