FLLA vs. ILF
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF).
FLLA and ILF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. Both FLLA and ILF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLLA or ILF.
Performance
FLLA vs. ILF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than ILF's -15.68% return.
FLLA
-20.23%
-4.36%
-13.67%
-13.39%
-0.76%
N/A
ILF
-15.68%
-5.24%
-11.09%
-9.06%
0.07%
0.04%
Key characteristics
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.75 | -0.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.96 | -0.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.89 | 0.93 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.64 | -0.30 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.16 | -1.04 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.53% | 8.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.84% | 17.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.87% | -67.48% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.73% | -28.39% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLLA vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ILF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and ILF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLLA vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLLA vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than ILF's 6.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 7.28% | 5.44% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.17% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 6.38% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 3.25% | 2.32% | 3.32% |
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.87%, smaller than the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and ILF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLLA vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) at 4.25%. This indicates that FLLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.