FLLA vs. ASHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).
FLLA and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both FLLA and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLLA vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLLA vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 17.39% | 51.81% | -26.89% | 32.71% | 7.78% | -8.93% | -15.08% | 19.59% | -2.78% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | -0.64% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -4.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's -0.64% return.
FLLA
- 1D
- 3.89%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 54.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- -2.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLLA vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLLA vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank
FLLA
ASHR
FLLA vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLLA | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.39 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | 1.90 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 2.16 | +2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 9.57 | +5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLLA | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.39 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | -0.08 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.20 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and ASHR is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLLA vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than ASHR's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 5.16% | 6.06% | 7.04% | 5.45% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.18% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.32% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and ASHR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLLA | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.88% | -51.30% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -11.41% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -46.44% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -23.87% | +19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -29.34% | +15.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.67% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FLLA vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 5.81%. This indicates that FLLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLLA | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 5.81% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 11.30% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 18.63% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 23.85% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 24.13% | +3.53% |