FLKR vs. UFOX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while UFOX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 17.78%/yr vs 21.65%/yr for UFOX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UFOX.

Performance

FLKR vs. UFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than UFOX's 48.96% return.

FLKR

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 98.10%
• 6M: 113.45%
• 1Y: 185.66%
• 3Y*: 45.52%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: —

UFOX

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 48.96%
• 6M: 46.16%
• 1Y: 93.99%
• 3Y*: 42.93%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. UFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	98.10%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	1.98%
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF	48.96%	34.83%	34.11%	21.83%	-27.26%	25.68%	29.78%	5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and UFOX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019	0.62

The correlation between FLKR and UFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. UFOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	UFOX
Technology	64.3%	77.8%
Industrials	12.8%	13.9%
Financial Services	7.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Healthcare	2.5%	-
Communication Services	1.6%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Energy	0.4%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. UFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

UFOX

UFOX Risk / Return Rank: 94
UFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
UFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
UFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
UFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
UFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. UFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	UFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.08	3.40	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	3.94	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.53	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.11	6.68	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.21	28.71	-0.50

FLKR vs. UFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is comparable to the UFOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and UFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. UFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than UFOX's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and UFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	UFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-33.90%	-16.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-14.14%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-28.14%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	-33.90%	-15.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.25%	-10.69%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-9.02%	-13.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	3.29%	+3.32%

Volatility

FLKR vs. UFOX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) at 13.40%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	UFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.85%	13.40%	+12.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.11%	23.05%	+19.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.82%	27.78%	+18.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.58%	25.05%	+4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.37%	25.48%	+2.89%

FLKR vs. UFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UFOX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. UFOX - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than UFOX's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.95%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF	0.39%	0.56%	0.79%	1.40%	1.63%	1.17%	0.99%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and UFOX in my portfolio?

FLKR and UFOX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or UFOX?

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to UFOX (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs UFOX's -33.90%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or UFOX?

On 5-year performance, UFOX leads with 21.65% vs 17.78% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UFOX has been the lower-risk option at 13.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or UFOX?

Over the 5-year period, UFOX has performed better with a 21.65% return vs 17.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or UFOX?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UFOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or UFOX?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.39% for UFOX.

What is the main difference between FLKR and UFOX?

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UFOX is Technology Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while UFOX tracks BlueStar Connective Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.30% for UFOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 3.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.