FLKR vs. TSMU

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while TSMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. FLKR is passively managed, while TSMU is actively managed. Over the past year, FLKR returned 135.11% vs 133.31% for TSMU. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSMU.

Performance

FLKR vs. TSMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 76.07% return, which is significantly higher than TSMU's 59.43% return.

FLKR

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -17.05%
• 6M: 56.97%
• YTD: 76.07%
• 1Y: 135.11%
• 3Y*: 40.18%
• 5Y*: 15.51%
• 10Y*: —

TSMU

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -13.05%
• 6M: 38.73%
• YTD: 59.43%
• 1Y: 133.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. TSMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	76.07%	91.91%	-10.03%
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	59.43%	74.83%	3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and TSMU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024	0.55

The correlation between FLKR and TSMU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. TSMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	TSMU
Technology	62.9%	66.7%
Industrials	14.6%	-
Financial Services	7.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	-
Healthcare	2.4%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. TSMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

TSMU

TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 68
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. TSMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	TSMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.71	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.26	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.28	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.85	3.81	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.64	11.37	+6.26

FLKR vs. TSMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the TSMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and TSMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. TSMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum TSMU drawdown of -63.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and TSMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	TSMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-63.73%	+13.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.24%	-35.18%	+11.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.90%	-24.22%	+2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.93%	-15.72%	-6.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.69%	11.77%	-4.08%

Volatility

FLKR vs. TSMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is 23.87%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a volatility of 34.71%. This indicates that FLKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	TSMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	34.71%	-10.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.79%	63.45%	-15.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.63%	78.95%	-28.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.30%	83.14%	-51.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.29%	83.14%	-53.85%

FLKR vs. TSMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. TSMU - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.62%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and TSMU in my portfolio?

FLKR and TSMU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or TSMU?

TSMU has higher volatility (34.71%) compared to FLKR (23.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs TSMU's -63.73%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or TSMU?

On 1-year performance, FLKR leads with 135.11% vs 133.31% for TSMU. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLKR has been the lower-risk option at 23.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or TSMU?

Over the 1-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 135.11% return vs 133.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or TSMU?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or TSMU?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.

What is the main difference between FLKR and TSMU?

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while TSMU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 1.50% for TSMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.