FLKR vs. TRMD
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while TRMD (TORM plc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 17.20%/yr vs 44.51%/yr for TRMD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLKR vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 88.17% return, which is significantly higher than TRMD's 58.13% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 69.24%
- YTD
- 88.17%
- 1Y
- 153.09%
- 3Y*
- 45.44%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TRMD
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 37.79%
- YTD
- 58.13%
- 1Y
- 77.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 44.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 88.17% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -19.17% |
TRMD TORM plc | 58.13% | 11.21% | -23.37% | 31.64% | 297.66% | 12.91% | -25.94% | 84.18% | -22.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and TRMD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
TRMD
FLKR vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLKR | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | 3.50 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.76 | 9.19 | +11.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum TRMD drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and TRMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -60.59% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.03% | -23.53% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -60.59% | +34.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.14% | -60.59% | +12.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.53% | -13.49% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.93% | -22.50% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 8.96% | -1.64% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 24.66% compared to TORM plc (TRMD) at 13.04%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.66% | 13.04% | +11.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.71% | 29.13% | +17.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.65% | 38.27% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.98% | 46.26% | -15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.12% | 59.70% | -30.58% |
Dividends
FLKR vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than TRMD's 8.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.45% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
TRMD TORM plc | 8.21% | 10.32% | 30.13% | 23.05% | 6.99% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and TRMD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to TRMD (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs TRMD's -60.59%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and TRMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer