FLKR vs. HGER
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLKR returned 35.68%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for HGER. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
FLKR vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 61.37% return, which is significantly higher than HGER's 29.53% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 117.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
HGER
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- YTD
- 29.53%
- 1Y
- 40.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.49M | $47.84M | $51.57M | |
| $46.51M | $66.72M | $45.77M |
FLKR vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 61.37% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -23.44% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 29.53% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and HGER is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FLKR and HGER shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
HGER
FLKR vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLKR | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.87 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 10.23 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -23.31% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -14.04% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.17% | -14.04% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.42% | -3.94% | -24.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.96% | -7.66% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.61% | 3.94% | +5.67% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 5.64%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.39% | 5.64% | +15.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.33% | 15.43% | +34.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.42% | 17.71% | +35.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 17.67% | +14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.79% | 17.67% | +12.12% |
FLKR vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLKR vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than HGER's 5.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.86% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.47% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and HGER have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to HGER (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 35.68% vs 18.61% for HGER. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 35.68% return vs 18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 2.86% for FLKR.
FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while HGER is Commodities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer