FLKR vs. GREK
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 16.65%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for GREK. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for GREK.
Performance
FLKR vs. GREK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 86.43% return, which is significantly higher than GREK's 10.53% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- 6.28%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 86.43%
- 6M
- 95.63%
- 1Y
- 177.77%
- 3Y*
- 43.23%
- 5Y*
- 16.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GREK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
FLKR vs. GREK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 86.43% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 10.53% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and GREK is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.47 |
FLKR vs. GREK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLKR
GREK
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FLKR
GREK
-
Industrials
FLKR
GREK
Financial Services
FLKR
GREK
Consumer Cyclical
FLKR
GREK
Basic Materials
FLKR
GREK
Healthcare
FLKR
GREK
-
Communication Services
FLKR
GREK
Consumer Defensive
FLKR
GREK
Energy
FLKR
GREK
Utilities
FLKR
GREK
Real Estate
FLKR
-
GREK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. GREK — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
GREK
FLKR vs. GREK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLKR | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.27 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.77 | 1.70 | +6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.92 | 5.27 | +22.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLKR | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03 | 1.51 | +2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.97 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.16 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. GREK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum GREK drawdown of -79.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and GREK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -79.50% | +29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.03% | -21.32% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -22.63% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.51% | -30.46% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -5.63% | -8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -45.30% | +23.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 6.88% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. GREK - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 26.26% compared to Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) at 8.07%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GREK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.26% | 8.07% | +18.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | 20.47% | +20.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 24.14% | +20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.12% | 24.41% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 29.84% | -1.73% |
FLKR vs. GREK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GREK's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLKR vs. GREK - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than GREK's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.07% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.13% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and GREK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to GREK (8.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs GREK's -79.50%.
On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 23.55% vs 16.65% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.07% for FLKR.
FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GREK is Emerging Markets Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.58% for GREK.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and GREK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer