PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. PKB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJH vs. PKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJH vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
6.40%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
5.41%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%4.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than PKB's 5.41% return.


FLJH

1D
2.17%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
6.40%
6M
13.61%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
27.63%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*

PKB

1D
3.55%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
5.41%
6M
2.13%
1Y
45.16%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHPKBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.77

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

2.53

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.94

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

10.52

+0.22

FLJH vs. PKB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the PKB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and PKB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHPKBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.77

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.58

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.36

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and PKB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLJH vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than PKB's 0.15% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.67%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.15%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and PKB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHPKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-65.21%

+33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-15.41%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-34.85%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-11.67%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-15.86%

+10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

4.31%

-1.08%

Volatility

FLJH vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 8.09%, while Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJHPKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

9.07%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

17.21%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.87%

25.66%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

25.54%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

27.09%

-7.21%