FLIN vs. VO
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLIN returned 3.56%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for VO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
FLIN vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 8.60% return.
FLIN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
FLIN vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -12.18% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 8.60% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLIN and VO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between FLIN and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLIN vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
VO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLIN
VO
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
VO
Industrials
FLIN
VO
Energy
FLIN
VO
Basic Materials
FLIN
VO
Technology
FLIN
VO
Healthcare
FLIN
VO
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
VO
Utilities
FLIN
VO
Communication Services
FLIN
VO
Real Estate
FLIN
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
VO
FLIN vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLIN | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.23 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.01 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 7.62 | -9.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLIN | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.31 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.50 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -58.87% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | -8.17% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -19.02% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | -27.57% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | -2.10% | -17.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.86% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 2.15% | +5.58% |
Volatility
FLIN vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.51%. This indicates that FLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 3.51% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 9.46% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 12.51% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 17.62% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 18.96% | +1.48% |
FLIN vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLIN vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than VO's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLIN and VO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to VO (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 5-year performance, VO leads with 7.59% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VO has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.03% for VO.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer