PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLG vs. CMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLG vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLG

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.54%
6M
7.72%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
-28.46%
5Y*
-13.57%
10Y*
-6.14%
ALL TIME*
9.43%

CMA

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.62M$65.63M$68.59M

FLG vs. CMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
13.12%35.39%-69.13%26.87%-24.54%22.67%-5.82%35.38%-23.24%-13.88%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLG and CMA is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 1993

0.50

The correlation between FLG and CMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLG:

$5.93B

CMA:

$11.79B

EPS

FLG:

$0.10

CMA:

$5.44

PE Ratio

FLG:

148.91

CMA:

16.31

PS Ratio

FLG:

1.13

CMA:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLG:

$4.24B

CMA:

$4.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLG:

$2.44B

CMA:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLG:

$676.00M

CMA:

$989.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLG vs. CMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLG
FLG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLG vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGCMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

FLG vs. CMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLG vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGCMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

Volatility

FLG vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGCMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.78%

Dividends

FLG vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

FLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while CMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
1.60%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
0.28%0.32%2.14%6.65%7.91%5.57%6.45%5.66%7.23%5.22%4.27%6.13%

Financials

FLG vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flagstar Financial, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FLG and CMA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLG and CMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer