CMA vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Performance
CMA vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMA vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMA Comerica Incorporated | 2.00% | 46.73% | 16.74% | -11.09% | -20.38% | 61.53% | -16.79% | 8.46% | -19.18% | 29.34% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | -2.69% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Fundamentals
CMA:
$11.79B
RF:
$22.99B
CMA:
$5.44
RF:
$2.42
CMA:
16.31
RF:
10.80
CMA:
2.46
RF:
2.42
CMA:
1.61
RF:
1.30
CMA:
$4.80B
RF:
$9.61B
CMA:
$3.27B
RF:
$7.17B
CMA:
$989.00M
RF:
$2.81B
Returns By Period
CMA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RF
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMA vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
CMA
RF
CMA vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.17 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CMA and RF is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CMA vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
CMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than RF's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMA Comerica Incorporated | 2.40% | 3.27% | 4.59% | 5.09% | 4.07% | 3.13% | 4.87% | 3.74% | 2.68% | 1.26% | 1.31% | 1.98% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.00% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
CMA vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -92.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -14.79% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.19% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.31% | — |
Volatility
CMA vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 29.81% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 31.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 36.02% | — |
Financials
CMA vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comerica Incorporated and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMA vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
CMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
CMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.
CMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.