PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMA vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMA and RF is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

CMA vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,834.34%
1,526.30%
CMA
RF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMA:

0.59

RF:

1.17

Sortino Ratio

CMA:

1.03

RF:

1.81

Omega Ratio

CMA:

1.13

RF:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

CMA:

0.40

RF:

1.31

Martin Ratio

CMA:

2.62

RF:

5.65

Ulcer Index

CMA:

7.51%

RF:

5.52%

Daily Std Dev

CMA:

33.47%

RF:

26.55%

Max Drawdown

CMA:

-78.35%

RF:

-92.65%

Current Drawdown

CMA:

-29.78%

RF:

-12.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMA:

$8.47B

RF:

$22.37B

EPS

CMA:

$4.00

RF:

$1.77

PE Ratio

CMA:

16.10

RF:

13.90

PEG Ratio

CMA:

0.32

RF:

4.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMA:

$4.76B

RF:

$7.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMA:

$4.52B

RF:

$8.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMA:

$213.00M

RF:

$2.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMA achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 28.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CMA has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 6.61%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.


CMA

YTD

15.44%

1M

-8.93%

6M

30.97%

1Y

16.99%

5Y*

1.88%

10Y*

6.61%

RF

YTD

28.38%

1M

-8.64%

6M

28.12%

1Y

29.99%

5Y*

11.09%

10Y*

12.11%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMA vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.591.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMA, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.031.81
The chart of Omega ratio for CMA, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMA, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.401.31
The chart of Martin ratio for CMA, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.625.65
CMA
RF

The current CMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMA and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.59
1.17
CMA
RF

Dividends

CMA vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RF's 4.12% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
4.64%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%1.69%1.43%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.12%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

CMA vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMA drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMA and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-29.78%
-12.67%
CMA
RF

Volatility

CMA vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Comerica Incorporated (CMA) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 7.89%. This indicates that CMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.73%
7.89%
CMA
RF

Financials

CMA vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comerica Incorporated and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab