CMA vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMA or RF.
Key characteristics
| CMA | RF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.25% | 5.91% |
| 1Y Return | 72.77% | 34.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.24% | -0.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.84% | 11.50% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.35% | 10.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.73 | 1.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.00% | 31.83% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.35% | -92.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -39.02% | -12.32% |
Fundamentals
| CMA | RF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.10B | $18.16B |
| EPS | $5.03 | $1.85 |
| PE Ratio | 10.65 | 10.72 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.32 | 9.99 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.31B | $6.80B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.47B | $6.94B |
Correlation
The correlation between CMA and RF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CMA vs. RF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CMA achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CMA has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 5.35%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMA vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMA vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
CMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than RF's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMA Comerica Incorporated | 5.15% | 5.09% | 4.07% | 3.13% | 4.87% | 3.74% | 2.68% | 1.26% | 1.31% | 1.98% | 1.69% | 1.43% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.54% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
CMA vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMA drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMA and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMA vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Comerica Incorporated (CMA) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 4.19%. This indicates that CMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CMA vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comerica Incorporated and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities