PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLG vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLG vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLG achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FLG has underperformed MRK with an annualized return of -6.14%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.


FLG

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.54%
6M
7.72%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
-28.46%
5Y*
-13.57%
10Y*
-6.14%
ALL TIME*
9.43%

MRK

1D
0.32%
1M
0.49%
6M
19.80%
YTD
25.51%
1Y
69.70%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
12.26%
ALL TIME*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.62M$65.63M$68.59M
$997.19M$1.08B$1.21B

FLG vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
13.12%35.39%-69.13%26.87%-24.54%22.67%-5.82%35.38%-23.24%-13.88%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
25.51%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FLG and MRK is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 1993

0.20

The correlation between FLG and MRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLG:

$5.93B

MRK:

$321.62B

EPS

FLG:

$0.10

MRK:

$3.59

PE Ratio

FLG:

148.91

MRK:

36.23

PEG Ratio

FLG:

11.34

MRK:

0.03

PS Ratio

FLG:

1.13

MRK:

4.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLG:

$4.24B

MRK:

$65.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLG:

$2.44B

MRK:

$49.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLG:

$676.00M

MRK:

$22.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLG vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLG
FLG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLG vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

6.39

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

16.11

-12.44

FLG vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLG and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLG vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLG and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.11%

-68.61%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-11.37%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.75%

-43.44%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.11%

-43.44%

-36.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.11%

-43.44%

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.07%

-1.23%

-62.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-18.79%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

4.50%

+2.70%

Volatility

FLG vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 8.23%. This indicates that FLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

8.23%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

19.68%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.90%

27.87%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.47%

24.10%

+29.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.78%

23.13%

+20.65%

Dividends

FLG vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

FLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MRK's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLG
Flagstar Financial, Inc.
0.28%0.32%2.14%6.65%7.91%5.57%6.45%5.66%7.23%5.22%4.27%6.13%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.58%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%

Financials

FLG vs. MRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flagstar Financial, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FLG and MRK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLG has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to MRK (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLG dropped -80.11% vs MRK's -68.61%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLG and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer