FLG vs. MRK
FLG (Flagstar Financial, Inc.) and MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) are both stocks. FLG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MRK operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FLG returned -5.88%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for MRK. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLG vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLG achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly higher than MRK's 11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FLG has underperformed MRK with an annualized return of -5.88%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.
FLG
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 30.30%
- 3Y*
- -20.47%
- 5Y*
- -11.52%
- 10Y*
- -5.88%
MRK
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 51.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
FLG vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLG Flagstar Financial, Inc. | 19.56% | 35.39% | -69.13% | 26.87% | -24.54% | 22.67% | -5.82% | 35.38% | -23.24% | -13.88% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 11.50% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -7.20% | 22.27% | 39.95% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLG and MRK is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 1993 | 0.21 |
The correlation between FLG and MRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLG:
$7.01B
MRK:
$285.47B
FLG:
-$0.13
MRK:
$3.58
FLG:
1.45
MRK:
4.39
FLG:
0.92
MRK:
6.22
FLG:
$4.53B
MRK:
$65.59B
FLG:
$1.90B
MRK:
$49.79B
FLG:
$29.00M
MRK:
$22.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLG vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank
FLG
MRK
FLG vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLG | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 4.53 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 11.16 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLG vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLG drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLG and MRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLG | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -68.61% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -11.37% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.11% | -43.44% | -36.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.11% | -43.44% | -36.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.11% | -43.44% | -36.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.03% | -7.06% | -54.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.15% | -18.83% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 4.60% | +2.80% |
Volatility
FLG vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) is 7.17%, while Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that FLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLG | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 9.78% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.53% | 18.13% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.58% | 27.15% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 23.72% | +29.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.77% | 22.96% | +20.81% |
Dividends
FLG vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
FLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than MRK's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLG Flagstar Financial, Inc. | 0.27% | 0.32% | 2.14% | 6.65% | 7.91% | 5.57% | 6.45% | 5.66% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 4.27% | 6.13% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3.07% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
Financials
FLG vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flagstar Financial, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLG vs. MRK - Profitability Comparison
FLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flagstar Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 498.00M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.
MRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
FLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flagstar Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.00M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
MRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.
FLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flagstar Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
MRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLG and MRK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRK has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to FLG (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLG dropped -80.11% vs MRK's -68.61%.
MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLG and MRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer