PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMA vs. FITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMA vs. FITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CMA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FITB

1D
1.65%
1M
8.35%
YTD
15.56%
6M
13.13%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
33.20%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMA vs. FITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
15.56%14.75%27.20%10.41%-21.94%62.46%-5.43%35.20%-20.32%15.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CMA and FITB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.66

The correlation between CMA and FITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMA:

$11.79B

FITB:

$44.51B

EPS

CMA:

$5.44

FITB:

$3.06

PE Ratio

CMA:

16.31

FITB:

17.54

PS Ratio

CMA:

2.46

FITB:

2.79

PB Ratio

CMA:

1.61

FITB:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMA:

$4.80B

FITB:

$13.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMA:

$3.27B

FITB:

$9.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMA:

$989.00M

FITB:

$3.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMA vs. FITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FITB
FITB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMA vs. FITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comerica Incorporated (CMA) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMAFITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

CMA vs. FITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMA vs. FITB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMAFITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

Volatility

CMA vs. FITB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMAFITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.30%

Dividends

CMA vs. FITB - Dividend Comparison

CMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
1.60%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
2.93%3.29%3.41%3.94%3.84%2.62%3.92%3.06%3.14%1.98%1.97%2.59%

Financials

CMA vs. FITB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comerica Incorporated and Fifth Third Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.21B
3.87B
(CMA) Total Revenue
(FITB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMA vs. FITB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Comerica Incorporated and Fifth Third Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
69.4%
67.3%
Portfolio components
CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

FITB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

FITB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

FITB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMA and FITB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMA and FITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer