FLDOX vs. BLNDX
FLDOX (Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FLDOX returned 6.11%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for BLNDX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLDOX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.
Performance
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDOX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 11.02% return.
FLDOX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 5.34%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
BLNDX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund | 5.34% | 10.49% | 14.05% | 10.91% | -10.73% | 8.74% | 5.56% | 0.08% |
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 11.02% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDOX and BLNDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FLDOX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDOX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDOX
BLNDX
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLDOX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 4.49 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 16.82 | -6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDOX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNDX drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDOX and BLNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDOX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.13% | -17.69% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.79% | -6.33% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.56% | -17.69% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -17.69% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -6.33% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -3.20% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.69% | -0.32% |
Volatility
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) is 3.00%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that FLDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDOX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.87% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.10% | 10.04% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.50% | 12.85% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 11.73% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.45% | 11.78% | -3.33% |
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDOX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLDOX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison
FLDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than BLNDX's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.66% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund | 3.43% | 3.61% | 10.96% | 2.38% | 2.83% | 6.41% | 1.04% | 1.61% | 4.82% | 4.00% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDOX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNDX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to FLDOX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDOX dropped -18.13% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.
BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDOX and BLNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer