FLDOX vs. FLDFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLDOX (Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund) and FLDFX (Meeder Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - FLDOX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Meeder Funds, while FLDFX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Meeder Funds. Over the past 10 years, FLDOX returned 7.56%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for FLDFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLDOX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for FLDFX.

Performance

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDOX achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLDFX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FLDOX has underperformed FLDFX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while FLDFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.

FLDOX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 16.36%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

FLDFX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 20.94%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: 9.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund	6.27%	10.49%	14.05%	10.91%	-10.73%	8.74%	5.56%	11.13%	-2.59%	15.99%
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund	8.51%	12.35%	26.72%	12.08%	-11.07%	13.22%	5.27%	12.29%	-3.25%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDOX and FLDFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.95

The correlation between FLDOX and FLDFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLDOX vs. FLDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDOX

FLDOX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FLDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FLDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FLDFX

FLDFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FLDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FLDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FLDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLDOX	FLDFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.41	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.41	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.97	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	13.01	-0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FLDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDOX and FLDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLDOX	FLDFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.41	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.86	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.86	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.53	+0.33

Drawdowns

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDOX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum FLDFX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDOX and FLDFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDOX	FLDFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.13%	-36.88%	+18.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.79%	-7.19%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.56%	-11.47%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.13%	-20.41%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.13%	-20.41%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-7.97%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	1.64%	-0.29%

Volatility

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund (FLDOX) is 2.29%, while Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that FLDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDOX	FLDFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	2.67%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.62%	7.00%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.04%	8.91%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.25%	11.76%	-3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.55%	10.60%	-2.05%

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDOX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDFX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLDOX vs. FLDFX - Dividend Comparison

FLDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than FLDFX's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund	3.24%	3.50%	26.22%	1.58%	3.76%	8.15%	0.60%	1.43%	1.41%	6.08%	1.11%	1.26%
FLDOX Meeder Moderate Allocation Fund	3.40%	3.61%	10.96%	2.38%	2.83%	6.41%	1.04%	1.61%	4.82%	4.00%	1.64%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDOX and FLDFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FLDOX and FLDFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLDOX or FLDFX?

FLDFX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FLDOX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDOX dropped -18.13% vs FLDFX's -36.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.