FLDB vs. GVI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) and GVI (iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. FLDB is actively managed, while GVI is passively managed. Over the past year, FLDB returned 4.19% vs 3.89% for GVI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

FLDB vs. GVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLDB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GVI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 4.18%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 1.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDB vs. GVI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.28%	4.93%	4.29%
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF	-0.00%	6.66%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDB and GVI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.32

Return for Risk

FLDB vs. GVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

GVI

GVI Risk / Return Rank: 44
GVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GVI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GVI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDB vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLDB	GVI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.67	1.56	+3.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.43	2.39	+6.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.11	1.28	+0.83
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.08	2.17	+22.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	93.63	6.60	+87.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLDB vs. GVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDB Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is higher than the GVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDB and GVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLDB	GVI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67	1.56	+3.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.56	0.76	+2.80

Drawdowns

FLDB vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum GVI drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and GVI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLDB	GVI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-12.93%	+12.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	-1.79%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-12.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-1.17%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-1.86%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	0.59%	-0.55%

Volatility

FLDB vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.34%, while iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLDB	GVI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	0.77%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.61%	1.78%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91%	2.50%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.31%	3.97%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.31%	3.53%	-2.22%

FLDB vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLDB and GVI have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLDB vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison

FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than GVI's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.45%	4.72%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF	3.62%	3.48%	3.40%	2.75%	1.86%	1.46%	1.84%	2.29%	2.16%	1.91%	1.77%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLDB and GVI in my portfolio?

FLDB and GVI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLDB or GVI?

GVI has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to FLDB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDB dropped -0.49% vs GVI's -12.93%.

Which ETF is better, FLDB or GVI?

On 1-year performance, FLDB leads with 4.19% vs 3.89% for GVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, FLDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLDB or GVI?

Over the 1-year period, FLDB has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLDB or GVI?

FLDB and GVI have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLDB or GVI?

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 3.62% for GVI.

What is the main difference between FLDB and GVI?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.