FLDB vs. VTIPX
FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) and VTIPX (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares) are both funds - FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while VTIPX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past year, FLDB returned 4.45% vs 4.48% for VTIPX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLDB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for VTIPX.
Performance
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDB achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than VTIPX's 1.99% return.
FLDB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTIPX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 3.05%
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF | 1.41% | 4.93% | 4.29% |
VTIPX Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares | 1.99% | 5.96% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLDB and VTIPX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLDB vs. VTIPX — Risk / Return Rank
FLDB
VTIPX
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares (VTIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLDB | VTIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.99 | 2.94 | +2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.27 | 4.93 | +4.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.22 | 1.61 | +0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 26.16 | 6.42 | +19.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 99.49 | 24.82 | +74.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLDB | VTIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99 | 2.94 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.62 | 1.03 | +2.59 |
Drawdowns
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum VTIPX drawdown of -5.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and VTIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLDB | VTIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -5.36% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.17% | -0.72% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -1.11% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.19% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.32%, while Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares (VTIPX) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLDB | VTIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 0.53% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.60% | 1.09% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 1.52% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 2.66% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 2.22% | -0.91% |
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIPX's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLDB vs. VTIPX - Dividend Comparison
FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than VTIPX's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.72% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIPX Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares | 3.48% | 3.70% | 2.60% | 2.76% | 6.74% | 4.59% | 1.11% | 1.88% | 2.37% | 1.50% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLDB and VTIPX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTIPX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to FLDB (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDB dropped -0.49% vs VTIPX's -5.36%.
FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLDB and VTIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer