PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLDB vs. FBNDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLDB and FBNDX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FLDB vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.40%
-1.26%
FLDB
FBNDX

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FLDB:

1.57%

FBNDX:

5.37%

Max Drawdown

FLDB:

-0.38%

FBNDX:

-20.16%

Current Drawdown

FLDB:

0.00%

FBNDX:

-9.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDB achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than FBNDX's 0.56% return.


FLDB

YTD

0.67%

1M

0.45%

6M

2.39%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBNDX

YTD

0.56%

1M

0.42%

6M

-1.26%

1Y

4.27%

5Y*

-0.54%

10Y*

1.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLDB vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBNDX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for FLDB: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLDB vs. FBNDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDB

FBNDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBNDX is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLDB vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLDB, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.500.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLDB, currently valued at 6.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.006.001.07
The chart of Omega ratio for FLDB, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.002.051.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLDB, currently valued at 14.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0014.390.78
The chart of Martin ratio for FLDB, currently valued at 54.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0054.531.76
FLDB
FBNDX


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50
3.50
0.71
FLDB
FBNDX

Dividends

FLDB vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

FLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FBNDX's 3.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLDB
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF
4.32%3.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.63%3.99%3.56%2.67%1.53%1.88%2.77%2.84%2.17%2.50%2.90%2.59%

Drawdowns

FLDB vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDB drawdown since its inception was -0.38%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -20.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDB and FBNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-3.16%
FLDB
FBNDX

Volatility

FLDB vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) is 0.38%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that FLDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.38%
1.39%
FLDB
FBNDX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab