PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCO vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCO vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCO achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.19% return.


FLCO

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

BSCR

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCO vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
0.10%7.53%1.93%7.94%-16.08%-2.06%10.01%14.82%-3.06%1.19%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.19%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCO and BSCR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.75

The correlation between FLCO and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCO vs. BSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCO
BSCR

Financial Services

12.6%
20.9%

Healthcare

2.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.0%

Industrials

2.1%
6.6%

Energy

1.7%
3.9%

Technology

1.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
12.1%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Financial Services

FLCO
12.6%
BSCR
20.9%

Healthcare

FLCO
2.8%
BSCR
10.4%

Communication Services

FLCO
2.4%
BSCR
4.0%

Industrials

FLCO
2.1%
BSCR
6.6%

Energy

FLCO
1.7%
BSCR
3.9%

Technology

FLCO
1.1%
BSCR
10.1%

Basic Materials

FLCO
0.5%
BSCR
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLCO
0.3%
BSCR
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCO
0.0%
BSCR
12.1%

Real Estate

FLCO

-

BSCR
3.0%

Utilities

FLCO

-

BSCR
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCO vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCO
FLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCO vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCOBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

2.11

-0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

10.76

-8.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

46.82

-41.48

FLCO vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCO and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCOBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

4.23

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.34

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.59

-0.28

Drawdowns

FLCO vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCO and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-17.26%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-0.42%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-2.41%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

-14.87%

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-0.08%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-3.34%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.10%

+0.82%

Volatility

FLCO vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that FLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.19%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

0.60%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

1.07%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

4.09%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

5.35%

+1.48%

FLCO vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCO vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

FLCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than BSCR's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.30%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%
FLCO
Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF
4.67%4.60%4.63%3.83%3.85%2.85%3.99%3.39%3.86%3.33%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCO and BSCR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCO has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCO dropped -22.71% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.39% vs 0.11% for FLCO. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.39% return vs 0.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.

FLCO has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.30% for BSCR.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLCO and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCO and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer